<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Right Wing Talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com</link>
	<description>Conservative Political News Source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:19:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Discussion about Voter ID</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/discussion/discussion-about-voter-id/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/discussion/discussion-about-voter-id/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/?p=1422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are the democrats so opposed to voter ID laws ? Are organizations, such as Achorn formed to abuse voter registration. It basically means that citizenship is under assault by making real votes less valueable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/discussion/discussion-about-voter-id/"></g:plusone></div><p>Why are the democrats so opposed to voter ID laws ? Are organizations, such as Achorn formed to abuse voter registration. It basically means that citizenship is under assault by making real votes less valueable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/discussion/discussion-about-voter-id/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame Wrigley Field ?</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/dont-blame-wrigley-field/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/dont-blame-wrigley-field/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrigley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/dont-blame-wrigley-field/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Print Email&#160; Text Size The Spectacle Blog By Aaron Goldstein on five.16.12 @ twelve:33PM In an op-ed in yesterday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal, wealthy Cohen argues that Wrigley Field ought to be torn down so as to place a merciful finish to the Chicago Cubs&#8217; 104-year (and counting) World Series drought: I am a Roman, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/dont-blame-wrigley-field/"></g:plusone></div><div>
<div class="post-options">Print Email&nbsp;</p>
<p><span>Text Size</span> <button class="increase"><img src="http://spectator.org/media/images/textsizeplus.gif" alt="+" /></button> <button class="decrease"><img src="http://spectator.org/media/images/textsizeminus.gif" alt="-" /></button></p>
</div>
<p>The Spectacle Blog</p>
<p>By Aaron Goldstein on five.16.12 @ twelve:33PM</p>
<p>In an op-ed in yesterday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal, wealthy Cohen argues that Wrigley Field ought to be torn down so as to place a merciful finish to the Chicago Cubs&#8217; 104-year (and counting) World Series drought:</p>
<p>I am a Roman, and to me, the expanse between Waveland and Addison on Chicago&#8217;s North aspect is Carthage. The struts and concessions, the catwalk where the late broadcaster Harry Caray once greeted me with all the fluid liquidity of an animatronic Disneyland pirate &#8211; Hello, Cubs fan! &#8211; the ramps that ascend sort of a ziggurat to heaven &#8211; it is a false heaven &#8211; the bases, trestles, ivy, wood seats and bleachers, the towering center-field scoreboard &#8211; all of it should be ripped out and frantic just like the holy artifacts were distributed of the temple in Jerusalem, heaped during a pile and burned. Then the bottom itself should be salted, created barren, lined with a housing project, say, a Stalinist monolith, thus never once more can a shrine arise on that haunted block. because it was with Moses, the followers and fans, though they search, shall never notice its bones.</p>
<p>Cohen is creating a scapegoat of Wrigley. currently it&#8217;s true the Cubs haven&#8217;t won a World Series in all the years they need played at Wrigley. however the Cubs haven&#8217;t perpetually been synonymous with futility and lovable losers. throughout their initial thirty years at Wrigley, the Cubs were amongst the most effective groups within the National League. Between 1916 and 1945, the Cubs won six NL pennants. solely the big apple Giants won a lot of NL pennants throughout this era with seven. Of course, the Cubs went zero for six within the Fall Classic throughout that amount as well as The known as Shot by Babe Ruth throughout the 1932 World Series against the Yankees. Nevertheless, the Cubs were a perennial contender and had fourteen consecutive winning seasons between 1926 and 1939.</p>
<p>So the Cubs hassle did not begin with Wrigley however rather with The Curse of the Billy Goat. Before Game four of the 1945 World Series between the Cubs and therefore the Detroit Tigers, Billy Goat Tavern owner William &#8220;Billy Goat&#8221; Sianis and his pet goat, Murphy, were refused admittance into Wrigley attributable to the goat&#8217;s stench. Sianis appealed to Cubs owner Phil Wrigley to no avail. An enraged Sianis told Wrigley, &#8220;The Cubs ain&#8217;t gonna win no a lot of. The Cubs can never win a World Series ciao because the goat isn&#8217;t allowed in Wrigley Field.&#8221; The Cubs lost the &#8217;45 Series in seven games and haven&#8217;t been back since.</p>
<p>Between 1946 and 1983, the Cubs had solely eight winning seasons and therefore the bulk of these came between 1967 and 1972 when the club was managed by Leo Durocher. The Cubs led the NL East for many of the 1969 till along came a black cat that crossed Ron Santo&#8217;s path on the on deck circle. From that time forward, the big apple Mets ascended to World Series glory.</p>
<p>Things are higher (or worse, reckoning on your purpose of view) since 1984 when the Cubs won the NL East solely to lose to the San Diego Padres within the NLCS in 5 games once having a 2 games to none lead desirous to win only 1 a lot of. Before there was Bill Buckner, there was Leon Durham and somewhat spilled Gatorade. Since 1984, the Cubs are to the post-season 5 times as well as 2003 once they were 5 outs faraway from winning their initial NL pennant in fifty eight years. Who knew that a fly ball by Luis Castillo headed down the leftfield line would cause most trouble?</p>
<p>So the next time the Cubs are within the post-season, for crying out loud, let within the Billy Goat, keep out the black cats, hide the Gatorade and publicly apologize to Steve Bartman. that will positive value lots but to tear down Wrigley and build a stadium with a 0.5 a billion bucks of taxpayer cash.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/dont-blame-wrigley-field/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Allies In Pakistan Agree to Reopen Supply Lines &#8212; For $365 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/our-allies-in-pakistan-agree-to-reopen-supply-lines-for-365-million/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/our-allies-in-pakistan-agree-to-reopen-supply-lines-for-365-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$365]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reopen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/our-allies-in-pakistan-agree-to-reopen-supply-lines-for-365-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Christian Science Monitor: the price of the US-led war effort in Afghanistan is getting ready to rise by $ 365 million annually underneath an agreement that might reopen a key NATO provide route through Pakistan that’s been closed for nearly six months. The accord, that the Pakistani government announced late Tuesday, would revive the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/our-allies-in-pakistan-agree-to-reopen-supply-lines-for-365-million/"></g:plusone></div><div id="resizetext">
<p><img class="c51" src="http://www.nationalreview.com/sites/default/files/nfs/uploaded/pakistannotourenemy.jpg" alt="" align="right" /></p>
<p>Via Christian Science Monitor:</p>
<p>the price of the US-led war effort in Afghanistan is getting ready to rise by $ 365 million annually underneath an agreement that might reopen a key NATO provide route through Pakistan that’s been closed for nearly six months. The accord, that the Pakistani government announced late Tuesday, would revive the transport of important provides of food and equipment from Pakistani ports overland to land-locked Afghanistan. In return, the US-led coalition pays Pakistan a still-to-be-fixed fee of $ one,500 to $ 1,800 for every truck carrying provides, a tab that officers acquainted with negotiations estimated would run nearly $ one million each day. The officers requested anonymity as a result of they weren’t approved to reveal details of the agreement. . .</p>
<p>Great. — Greg Pollowitz</p></div>
<p><img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/the-feed/300105/our-allies-pakistan-agree-reopen-supply-lines-365-million" target="_blank">The Feed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/our-allies-in-pakistan-agree-to-reopen-supply-lines-for-365-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Invictus</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/obama-invictus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/obama-invictus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invictus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/obama-invictus/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The myth for these days is that of Obama Invictus &#8212; the undefeated champion, the master campaigner, the person who may have taught lessons to Honey Fitz, Dick Daley, and Lyndon B. Johnson himself.  Obama is that the epitome of the politician for our time and maybe for all time.  His election was inevitable, therefore [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/obama-invictus/"></g:plusone></div><div>The myth for these days is that of Obama Invictus &#8212; the undefeated champion, the master campaigner, the person who may have taught lessons to Honey Fitz, Dick Daley, and Lyndon B. Johnson himself.  Obama is that the epitome of the politician for our time and maybe for all time.  His election was inevitable, therefore we&#8217;re told, as soon as he set to descend from Olympus and claim the White House. the thought that mere mortals would request to contest it&#8217;d be funny if it weren&#8217;t therefore pathetic. someone like Mitt Romney represents no quite a couple of hours&#8217; sport.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no purpose in making an attempt to destroy all the Obama myths &#8212; there are too several of them, and new ones are stoning up all the time. it&#8217;d nice if we have a tendency to may &#8212; this man is created of myths and next to zilch else.  If you destroyed every and each Obama myth, there would not be most as a ghostly image left.  (That includes the Obama Antichristus myth that has such a large amount of conservatives reduced to such a state of whimpering terror that they will not even vote against him.) however there are a couple of that actually should be stomped flat and place out on the corner for pickup, on the grounds that they are an insult to most as ponder, and also the myth of Obama as nice campaigner is one among them.</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s 2008 effort was the right campaign, meticulously planned and fully sort out right down to the last little detail.  Obama, Axelrod, Emmanuel, and also the remainder of the unindicted did not miss one trick &#8212; aside from, oh, Jeremiah Wright, the botched birth certificate unleash, the Brandenberg Gate speech, the classical pillars&#8230;minor stuff, simply overlooked and scarcely of any interest.</p>
<p>Looked at from that time of read &#8212; a rarely utilised angle of vision referred to as &#8220;reality&#8221; &#8212; O is revealed as roughly the right campaigner finally. however indeed, it goes well beyond that. you&#8217;ll go to this point on say that Obama has never really run a true campaign in any respect.</p>
<p>All of his early campaigns were distributed Chicago-style.  Recall that in 1995 he won the Democratic primary finally four of his opponents (not only 1, as most of the people think) were disqualified by town election commission.  That variety included Obama&#8217;s own patron, veteran Chicago pol Alice Palmer.  It left Obama to run primarily unopposed, that is that the approach they am fond of it within the Windy town.</p>
<p>His 2004 U.S. Senate run was created against the hapless Alan Keyes, who was parachuted in from elsewhere with the encouragement of an Illinois GOP that could not notice anyone else to run.  Basically, Obama was selected by the Chicago machine as Mr. up-and-coming, which was all it took.  Skill, ability, and achievement of any kind were all as irrelevant to the increase of Obama on that of the other machine pol.</p>
<p>As for 2008, that stands as an elaborate myth fabricated to create Obama look heroic and capable and to confuse any potential opposition &#8212; in alternative words, specifically like everything else ever written, said, or pantomimed concerning him. it&#8217;s been surprisingly successful at distorting what really occurred, even among an oversized variety of sworn conservatives, maybe as a result of several of the blue-blazer conservative elite bought into it for his or her own reasons.</p>
<p>The myth goes roughly like this: a tired and bumbling John McCain was running a clumsy campaign when he created the cardinal error of choosing a halfwit backwoods harpy who dragged him down into oblivion whereas Obama, the natural man of yank politics, played his magnificent endgame.</p>
<p>This is one among those fabulations that is convincing thanks to, not despite the actual fact that there is not a grain of truth to it.  McCain was running a reasonably solid if pedestrian campaign throughout the summer. the matter with senators running for president can be known as &#8220;Dole Syndrome,&#8221; a disorder that offers rise to delusions that the victim&#8217;s long-term support in his home state inevitably scales up to the national level, enabling the candidate to try and do nothing quite coast his thanks to victory.  It affects senators of each parties, though it looks to impact Republicans additional. you would like to travel back to the epoch of JFK and Hubert Humphrey to search out a senator capable of running a true, serious presidential campaign.  (What concerning Obama?  He was a senator, too, you say?  Well, of a kind &#8212; and as such, he ran a sort-of campaign.)</p>
<p>But this disorder scarcely afflicted McCain, and he held his own right up till the convention, when the selection of Sarah Palin as running mate threw his campaign into overdrive.  The retrospective conceive to undermine Palin&#8217;s actual impact is solely a Ministry of Truth effort distributed in hopes of stopping anyone from considering such a move within the future.  (I needn&#8217;t prove this, Tony Lee having coated it already at huge Journalism.) it&#8217;s no support within the record whatsoever.  The McCain-Palin campaign&#8217;s numbers mounted steadily once the convention (the actual numbers are left as an exercise for the student) and shortly matched and from time to time even surpassed Obama&#8217;s.  All things being equal, it appeared that they&#8217;d continue build up straight through to November, giving McCain a good if not overwhelming victory.</p>
<p>This formula was enough to convince one foolish AT author to toss his hat within the ring and decision it for McCain.  (Thanks to a useful ad server of the day, the story appeared with a commercial that includes an oversized photo of Hugh Downs, convincing the simply led that Downs had predicted Obama&#8217;s defeat.  This gave me my 1st style of Snopes.com immortality.)</p>
<p>But then arose that nightmare issue for all politicians, in line with previous professional Harold Macmillan: &#8220;events.&#8221;  The economic system collapsed on September fifteen, throwing everything (with one exception) into abject chaos.  McCain place his campaign on hold and came back to Washington to get that no-one in either chamber of Congress had any plan what to try and do.  (George W. Bush, fortunately, did have a thought or 2. no matter will be said against TARP &#8212; and there is lots &#8212; it did halt the money implosion before it may prostrate the complete economy.  No little feat, and one unmatched by such figures as Herbert Hoover, FDR, Lyndon Johnson, or Richard Nixon.)</p>
<p>McCain soon reactivated his campaign. however the events of September all too closely mirrored one 1/2 an ancient political saw: &#8220;with Republicans, you get a depression.&#8221;  From that time on, no Republican may have won in 2008, notwithstanding he&#8217;d been a mixture of Abe Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan.</p>
<p>And Obama?  Obama did nothing.  The Obama campaign was the one factor totally unaffected by the collapse.  Obama created no move whatsoever throughout the crisis.  He merely sat it out, continuing his campaign within the secure information that the crisis would hurt McCain so much worse than it&#8217;d him.  From that time on, he coasted to victory.  There was no &#8220;end game.&#8221;  There was scarcely any campaign, or would like for one.  Obama let the depression win the presidency for him.  (Though I&#8217;ve sometimes puzzled if there was additional to it.  At the danger of making another paranoid conspiracy virus, let me signifies that through late August and early September 2008 Charles Schumer was telling each media supply out there that the &#8220;banks were broke&#8221; and were near to go down the tubes, that after all duly occurred solely days later.  Was the money crisis given a trifle nudge to assure that it&#8217;d occur at the foremost helpful moment?  It strikes me as a trifle strange that Schumer&#8217;s behavior at the time has vanished down the memory hole.)</p>
<p>So during a real sense, due to dumb luck, corruption, and also the myriad loopholes created by identity politics, Obama succeeded in reaching state workplace, the U.S. Senate, and eventually the White House while not ever having to fight a true, serious, A-to-Z political campaign.</p>
<p>Contrast this with Mitt Romney, who has spectacular expertise each winning and losing elections.  He managed to win as a Republican within the blue citadel of Massachusetts &#8212; no mean trick.  Though he lost the 2008 primaries, he learned well type the expertise &#8212; his primary campaign of the past few months has been one among the foremost spectacular of recent years by any politician on either facet of the aisle.  With the tide consistently running against him, Romney targeted his opposition and took them down one once the opposite (when they did not do him the favor), in as controlled and deliberate a method as we have seen from anyone in recent campaigns.  And currently this successful, capable, and unmatched machine goes to be turned on Barack Obama.</p>
<p>The shoe is on the opposite foot this year &#8212; it&#8217;s Obama&#8217;s depression and his lousy recovery, and it&#8217;s unlikely he will overcome that, notwithstanding what number terrorists he kills or gays he marries within the Oval workplace.  His conceive to gin up world-changing events involving the pill, the Trayvon shooting, and his strategic condominium with mighty Afghanistan haven&#8217;t set the voters aflame. additional of an equivalent is unlikely to assist.  The nightmare is that he&#8217;ll try one thing on the order of the Osama bin Laden hit in August and find yourself obtaining lots of fine men killed.  What looks obvious at now is that he cannot run a customary campaign.  For all kinds of reasons, no minor one being the actual fact that he does not skills.</p>
<p>Mythmakers, have, not for the primary time, done Obama a disfavor, build up expectations to some extent where no one &#8212; abundant less this second-string community organizer &#8212; may ever fulfill them. therefore there being nothing else, this campaign are distributed in customary Chi-town vogue, with dirt, threats, and manipulation.</p>
<p>So what would I predict now around?  I dunno.  Go raise Hugh Downs. however i&#8217;ll tell you this: Obama cannot depend upon the machine, chance, or novelty now around &#8212; and there&#8217;s no sign that he&#8217;s most as alert to this reality.<span class="c4"><strong><em><span class="c3">J.R. Dunn is consulting editor of</span></em> <span class="c3">American Thinker</span><em><span class="c3">.</span></em></strong></span></p>
</div>
<p><img src="http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /><br />
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/obama_invictus.html" target="_blank">American Thinker</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/obama-invictus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gas Price hyprocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/media/gas-price-hyprocrisy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/media/gas-price-hyprocrisy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 14:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gas Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/?p=1222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This really shows the left wing media in action. The trouble with all of this is that they are never held to account for their action. &#160; &#160;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/media/gas-price-hyprocrisy/"></g:plusone></div><p>This really shows the left wing media in action. The trouble with all of this is that they are never held to account for their action.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qKdScVerrBU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/media/gas-price-hyprocrisy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Click here to discuss Obama and the teleprompter</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/discussion/right-wing-talk-discussion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/discussion/right-wing-talk-discussion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[discussion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/?p=1397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the use of a teleprompter a sign of intelligence ? Lets discuss ! In order to comment click on the heading (right wing talk discussion) you will se other comments and add your own.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/discussion/right-wing-talk-discussion/"></g:plusone></div><p>Is the use of a teleprompter a sign of intelligence ?<br />
Lets discuss !<br />
In order to comment click on the heading (right wing talk discussion) you will se other comments and add your own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/discussion/right-wing-talk-discussion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the internet help Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/republican/will-the-internet-help-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/republican/will-the-internet-help-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/?p=1386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the last election we were told the internet and the use of social networking delivered many votes for Obama. Will this be the case this time around will we see an mobile app developer give us an Obama app that provides location of polling areas and precinct locations? I am tired of the static [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/republican/will-the-internet-help-obama/"></g:plusone></div><p>During the last election we were told the internet and the use of social networking delivered many votes for Obama. Will this be the case this time around will we see an <a href="http://www.sterlingwebstudio.com">mobile app developer</a> give us an Obama app that provides location of polling areas and precinct locations? I am tired of the static add located on ABC Yahoo all the time. Will he be creative or will Romney take advantage of computer technology and outsource to a <a href="http://www.contactaway.com">freelance mobile platform</a> to build his own internet and mobile voter base. Will the <a href="http://www.theportablepc.com">portable computer</a> that is so indispensable today play a role in delivering the media and the message.</p>
<p>It is my belief that the web has become so vast that no one has an advantage unless he concedes this media by not participating in it or misusing it. Static ads mindless ads such as (who do vote for) are not sufficient. Creative ads focusing on substance are going to work for Romney. Obama has no substance so he will just make it up.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/?px"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=b388a877-9dbf-4c89-99c6-1af5e0479e9e" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/republican/will-the-internet-help-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Affirmative action president</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/president/affirmative-action-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/president/affirmative-action-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 14:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affirmative action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremiah Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norman Podhoretz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oval Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/?p=1378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama: The Affirmative Action President by Matt Patterson (columnist &#8211; Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/president/affirmative-action-president/"></g:plusone></div><div id="yui_3_2_0_6_1336859062289689" lang="EN-US">
<div id="yui_3_2_0_6_1336859062289688">
<div id="yui_3_2_0_6_1336859062289687"><strong id="yui_3_2_0_6_1336859062289685">Obama:    The Affirmative Action President<br />
by Matt Patterson<br />
(columnist &#8211; Washington Post, New    York Post, San Francisco Examiner)</strong>Years from now, historians    may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing    phenomenon, a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze    of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional    accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world&#8217;s    largest economy, direct the world&#8217;s most powerful military, execute the    world&#8217;s most consequential job?</p>
<p>Imagine a future historian    examining Obama&#8217;s pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy    League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy    non-job as a &#8220;community organizer&#8221;; a brief career as a state legislator    devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention,    so often did he vote &#8220;present&#8221;) ; and finally an unaccomplished single term in    the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his    presidential ambitions. He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no    signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his    troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for    decades served as Obama&#8217;s &#8220;spiritual mentor&#8221;; a real-life, actual terrorist    who served as Obama&#8217;s colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a    future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man    elected president?</p>
<p>Not    content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the    question recently in the Wall Street Journal:</p>
<p>To be sure, no white    candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of  America    like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have    lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled    in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against various    American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a    pass.</p>
<p>Let that sink in:    Obama was given a pass &#8212; held to a lower standard &#8212; because of the color of    his skin. Podhoretz continues:</p>
<p>And in any case, what did    such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as    he himself had said) &#8220;non-threatening,&#8221; all of which gave him a fighting    chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of    racism to rest?</p>
<p>Podhoretz puts his finger, I    think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon &#8212; affirmative action.    Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment    behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed    primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about    themselves.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, minorities    often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely    admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no    responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates    which follow. Liberals don&#8217;t care if these minority students fail; liberals    aren&#8217;t around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem    resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist.</p>
<p>Holding someone to a separate    standard merely because of the color of his skin &#8212; that&#8217;s affirmative action    in a nutshell, and if that isn&#8217;t racism, then nothing is. And that is    what  America did to Obama.</p>
<p>True, Obama himself was never    troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted,    Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades    at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a    mediocre record in  Illinois ; he was told he was good enough to be    president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of    the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of    ample evidence to the contrary. What could this breed if not the sort of empty    narcissism on display every time<br />
Obama speaks?</p>
<p>In 2008, many who agreed that    he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama&#8217;s oratory    skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people &#8212; conservatives included    &#8212; ought now to be deeply embarrassed. The man thinks and speaks in the    hoariest of clichés, and that&#8217;s when he has his teleprompter in front of him;    when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.***Not one    original idea has ever issued from his mouth &#8212; it&#8217;s all warmed-over Marxism    of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.*</p>
<p>And what about his character?    Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles.    Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see    a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with    his own incompetence. But really, what were we to expect? The man has never    been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act    responsibly?</p>
<p>In short:    our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament    nor the intellect to handle his job. *When you understand that, and only when    you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make    sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval    Office.*</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/?px"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=7111c909-f0b4-434c-96a8-c802847690f3" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/president/affirmative-action-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC News in the tank</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/uncategorized/abc-news-in-the-tank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/uncategorized/abc-news-in-the-tank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media distortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/?p=1371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama just announced that he wants Gay marriage approved by law. ABC indicates that this will have little effect in the battle ground States since Obama is doing so well in his reelection bid. Always a positive spin. It is my contention that these media monopolies declare that they are for the democratic party nation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/uncategorized/abc-news-in-the-tank/"></g:plusone></div><p>Obama just announced that he wants Gay marriage approved by law. ABC indicates that this will have little effect in the battle ground States since Obama is doing so well in his reelection bid. Always a positive spin. It is my contention that these media monopolies declare that they are for the democratic party nation wide, and provide equal time to Romney, but No Romney has to pay for his time in political ads.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/?px"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=ff2bb2aa-2066-40a2-a2ad-badfdc7ccd73" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/uncategorized/abc-news-in-the-tank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socialist Success</title>
		<link>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/socialist-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/socialist-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 18:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy of Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gross domestic product]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama and scialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rightwingtalk.com/?p=1367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where in the world can one find a success story for socialism. My first thought was Germany since they seem to be the anchor of the European Union but their unemployment rate is still near 8.0%, and debt to GDP is about 80 percent. Under Obama we have reached a record high of 69% and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/socialist-success/"></g:plusone></div><p>Where in the world can one find a success story for socialism. My first thought was Germany since they seem to be the anchor of the European Union but their unemployment rate is still near 8.0%, and debt to GDP is about 80 percent. Under Obama we have reached a record high of 69% and an unemployment rate over 8.0%. It appears under our socialist president we are changing our economy into a European economy. All he has to do is allow gas prices to increase or tax gasoline more to reach a European parity. One really can not compare unemployment figures since these are government figures filled with seasonal distortions by country and politics. The only growth seems to come from China. Here we have a communist country adopting a hands off approach (free market) in various areas of the country to fuel growth. Something that America started and excelled in. The left wing politicians simply do not comprehend the free market. They effort is focused on raising taxes to allow more spending, none of this provides for a growing economy. This will only cripple a vibrant nation.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/?px"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=d4529faf-5c54-4b91-86ad-35d4f1d884b0" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rightwingtalk.com/conservative-talk/socialist-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

